A Look at the Uber Microservices Architecture
Share This Article
Choose the best microservices vendor and trim the cost
Table of Contents
Subscribe to Our Blog
Microservices architecture systems are much discussed in today’s times. Many large enterprises in the world have seen enormous success after the adoption of microservices. These organizations meet their scaling and agility goals easily by adopting microservices.
While the main premise of this article will be the discussion of the Uber microservices architecture, we will also discuss the key concepts that govern the microservices architecture and the pros and cons of this software system framework.
Definition of Microservices Architecture
Microservices is a software architecture system that consists of small independent services, each of which performs a business function. Each of the independent business services is built on a technology stack that is most suited to the function.
Download Ebook for FREE "How to choose the best microservices vendor and trim the cost"
In a monolithic software architecture system, a large piece of cohesive code carries out all the functions. The code is tightly coupled together and is difficult to untangle. Though a monolith carries out a number of functions, adding new code or modifying existing code can be a burden. With more upgrades, the coding becomes more complicated till it becomes impossible at one stage.
Microservices Architecture-Key Concepts
Before designing a microservices system, it is vital to have a clear understanding of the scope of the services and the functionalities of the application at hand.
Main Design Guidelines for Microservices
- First, the domains should be separated and each business function should be clearly understood.
- Each of the microservices that you plan to have should have only a single functionality.
- The entire application should be designed in a manner so that it is possible to deploy each service independently.
- Inter-services communication should take place via a stateless server.
- Each service can be factored down into smaller services, each one with its own microservices.
What does it take to seal the many vulnerable points in the microservices architecture?
The components of the microservices architecture can be briefly described as follows:
Clients: The architecture has different types of clients with different management functions, such as build, search, and configure, among others.
Identity Providers: They authenticate client requests and pass them to the internal services via an API gateway.
API Gateway: This is the entry point for clients to send requests to specific microservices. The advantages of doing this include the ability to update services without letting the clients know, the ability of the services to use message protocols that are not web-friendly, and making use of the ability of the gateways to provide cross-cutting functions such as load balancing and providing security.
Messaging Formats: The API gateway uses both synchronous (REST and HTTP) and asynchronous (AMQP, STOMP, MQTT) message formats to communicate.
Databases: Each of the microservices has its own database to capture the data and implement the business function. The databases of a microservice are updated via their service API only.
Static Content: Once the microservices communication is over within the services themselves, the static content is then delivered to cloud-based storage. This is delivered to clients via CDN systems.
Management: The management component balances the services on nodes and identifies failures.
Service Discovery: This acts as a guide to the microservices to ascertain the communication route between the services. Basically, it maintains a list of the services that have nodes located on them.
Microservices Architecture – Pros and Cons
- Microservices allow the freedom to use different technologies for different services.
- Software release cycles are shortened.
- The microservices architecture system ensures the security of every service.
- Each of the services can be individually deployed.
- Each of the microservices accomplishes a single business function.
- There are more troubleshooting challenges that can occur.
- Configuration and related operations take more time.
- Maintaining transaction safety is a challenge.
- It is difficult to track data across different service boundaries.
- It is also difficult to move code across the different services.
- Remote calls can cause increased delays.
How Does Microservice Architecture Work?
Microservice architecture is an architectural style in which an application is composed of multiple services. Each service is autonomous and communicates with other services through a well-defined interface. Services are built around business capabilities, and they are independently deployable, scalable, and maintainable. Each service can be written in different programming languages and can use different data storage technologies. Microservice architecture makes it easier to maintain and extend applications because services are modular and can be replaced or modified independently. This also makes it easier to scale applications up or down, as individual services can be scaled independently.
Uber’s Transition into Microservices
Just as many other start-ups do, Uber first started off with a monolithic software architecture framework in place. However, this system was initially manageable as it took care of the cab hailing operations inside a single city.
However, Uber soon started expanding their operations worldwide and the problems started. The scalability and continuous integration aspects were soon affected.
Uber’s Previous Software System Architecture Worked in this Manner:
- The passenger and driver are connected via a REST API.
- Three adapters with an API within them performed the billing, sending messages, and payment actions.
- All the data was stored using a MySQL database.
All the different functions, such as passenger/trip/driver management, billing and payments, notifications, etc., were all composed within one framework.
Challenges Faced by UBER
These were the main problems faced by the monolithic software framework that UBER worked with.
- To update even a single feature, every feature had to be built again, deployed and tested many times.
- Fixing bugs became a very difficult job as there was only a single codebase, and developers had to change the code in this repository again and again.
- Scaling any feature together with the introduction of new features over many countries is getting to be very tough.
UBER decided to follow in the footsteps of other big giants like Amazon and Netflix and transition into microservices architecture. This meant multiple codebases from a single one and each of the microservices constructed to manage a single business function.
Read our blog "How to find the best microservices development company"
The introduction of the API gateway connected passengers and drivers. Similarly, from the gateway, other internal points, such as passenger/driver/trip management, and other internal points are connected.
All the units are designed to perform their functions independently.
Every feature could be scaled independently of the other. As an example, the number of people searching for taxis is greater than the number of people that actually book the cab services and make the payments. This also means that the number of processes that handle passenger management is greater than the number that manages the payment processes.
UBER broke down its monolith into cloud-based microservices for each of the functionalities and connected these via an API gateway.
UBER Microservices Architecture – Benefits
- Individual development teams were assigned ownership of specific services which helped to boost the quality, speed, and manageability of new module development.
- Teams were allowed to focus only on the services that needed scaling, and this helped to scale at high speed.
- Individual services could be updated without disrupting any other services.
- Fault tolerance has become more reliable.
The UBER microservices architecture shift paid off well for the company. The company then went on to develop and implement global standards that have been of great help to organizations that followed in their footsteps.
Share This Article
Yes, Uber uses microservices to power its various services, such as its ride-hailing and food delivery services. Uber's microservices architecture enables it to scale quickly and efficiently, allowing it to add new services and features with ease.
Uber's microservices architecture is a system of components that operate independently, but work together to provide a complete service. Each microservice is responsible for a specific function, such as managing user accounts, handling payments, or providing ride requests. These components are connected through an API, allowing them to communicate with each other and with the rest of the Uber platform. This architecture allows Uber to quickly develop, deploy, and scale its services, while also providing a robust and reliable experience for its users.
Uber switched to microservices for several reasons. First, it allowed for improved scalability, reliability, and efficiency. Microservices allow for the application to be broken down into small, independent services that can be deployed and managed separately from one another. This allows for faster development and deployment cycles, as well as more efficient resource utilization. Additionally, microservices allow for a more resilient system, as a failure in one service will not bring down the entire application. Finally, it allows for improved security, as each service can be monitored and managed separately.
Subscribe to Our Blog